Antique-Bottles.Net logo
If you are just visiting and found the information you were looking for please contribute to the running costs by making a donation.
Forums : : Register : : Log In : : Log Out : : Help : : Calendar : : Search


Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
 
All Forums >> [Bottle Forums] >> Cleaning and Repairing >> Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/7/2010 2:00:29 PM   
petepal


Posts: 10
Joined: 3/22/2008
Status: offline
I expect what I am about to say is really going to draw up some controversary.  You dig up an old bottle it's full of mud, rust or who knows what.  You wash it out  and sterilize it.  You've done a nice job it looks cool, and it's collectable so you decide to have it professionally cleaned and put it up for sale.  Now it looks like it just came off the assembly line.  No more effects of aging the history is wiped out but it doesn't matter to you.  So you see your bottle on line next to someone else's bottle that looks like it just came off the assembly line too.  Well guess what it did just come off an assembly line.

_____________________________

Pete "PAL" Palazzolo
Catfish Camp
Post #: 1
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/7/2010 5:44:12 PM   
chosi


Posts: 106
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: Northern Virginia
Status: offline
Here's my humble option:

If I you were buying an old house, wouldn't you want to clean it, put a fresh coat of paint on it, etc? Maybe that's an apples to oranges comparison, because you have to live in a house but not a bottle. But if you restore an old house, it doesn't really look like a new house, it looks like an old house did back when the house was originally built

I think the same way about bottles - after I tumble a nice squat blob-top soda bottle, it doesn't look anything like a new twist-off crown-top bottle that you would buy at the grocery store today. It looks like a really old bottle, but it looks like it did when it was new (if the tumble went well).

If you agree that you should wash the mud off of the old bottle you dug up, then is it just a question of how much mud you should wash off? Rinsing the bottle with water leaves lots of mud, soap & a bottle brush leaves less mud, a chemical clean will leave even less, and a tumbler might not leave any mud at all.


_____________________________

- Chosi
( See my website at www.chosi.org )

(in reply to petepal)
Post #: 2
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/7/2010 5:47:09 PM   
chosi


Posts: 106
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: Northern Virginia
Status: offline
Oops - I think my spell checker changed my humble "opinion" into my humble "option".

_____________________________

- Chosi
( See my website at www.chosi.org )

(in reply to chosi)
Post #: 3
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/7/2010 5:52:28 PM   
cyberdigger


Posts: 12291
Joined: 11/29/2008
From: I 195 @ US 9, NJ USA
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: petepal

I expect what I am about to say is really going to draw up some controversary.  You dig up an old bottle it's full of mud, rust or who knows what.  You wash it out  and sterilize it.  You've done a nice job it looks cool, and it's collectable so you decide to have it professionally cleaned and put it up for sale.  Now it looks like it just came off the assembly line.  No more effects of aging the history is wiped out but it doesn't matter to you.  So you see your bottle on line next to someone else's bottle that looks like it just came off the assembly line too.  Well guess what it did just come off an assembly line.


I feel like I don't quite get what you are trying to say here.. you saying you dug a repro? ..or is there a repro out there we should be aware of?
Or, worst of all.. did you send your bottle out for tumbling and got back a switcheroo??

< Message edited by cyberdigger -- 12/7/2010 5:54:00 PM >

(in reply to petepal)
Post #: 4
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/7/2010 6:24:12 PM   
GuntherHess


Posts: 11470
Joined: 12/13/2004
From: Frederick Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

sterilize it.


that's a new one on me

_____________________________

FREE Online Medicine Guide -
http://www.antiquemedicines.com/MedicineNexus/Nexus.htm

Web Site - http://antiquemedicines.com

Email : mknapp@antiquemedicines.com

(in reply to petepal)
Post #: 5
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/7/2010 11:07:35 PM   
petepal


Posts: 10
Joined: 3/22/2008
Status: offline
What I am saying is read between the lines.  I don't want to be rude or take any thing away from any one especially if someone makes  money restoring old bottles to their origional condition.  My point is this;  If a bottle looks like it's just come off the assembly line, how does one know if it didn't come off a assembly line?  You can't or won't carbon date the bottle, so does it matter if it's 100 years old or 1 day old?

_____________________________

Pete "PAL" Palazzolo
Catfish Camp

(in reply to cyberdigger)
Post #: 6
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 12:50:51 AM   
blobbottlebob


Posts: 3661
Joined: 12/20/2005
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline
quote:

If you agree that you should wash the mud off of the old bottle you dug up, then is it just a question of how much mud you should wash off?

Hey Chosi,
I like the term OPTION in your first post. I think collectors do have the option to tumble or not. I never tumble my stuff. I also know that there are guys out there cutting the living daylights out of the surface of found bottles. In MHO, this is damaging them far worse than a few little stains.

Some guys do a really nice job, though. They use the minimum of cutting agents and are only trying to clean (not re-surface). Those guys are worth every penny if you're into sparkling glass. Its not for me, though.

(in reply to chosi)
Post #: 7
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 12:57:45 AM   
petepal


Posts: 10
Joined: 3/22/2008
Status: offline
Sterlize bottle confusion.  Ok sorry what I meant was when ever I clean an old bottle I add a little bleach which kills all the germs and bacteria.  Got that from the health dept. when I was in the food business.

_____________________________

Pete "PAL" Palazzolo
Catfish Camp

(in reply to GuntherHess)
Post #: 8
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 5:49:41 AM   
suzanne

 

Posts: 689
Joined: 3/29/2009
Status: offline
Tumbling does not restore a bottle to its original condition.  It removes the top layer of glass, after which it can never be restore to original condition.  Old bottles are not naturally slick and perfect like a window pane. 

The only way it is not going to remove a layer of glass is if you just use it as a polisher.  I think that would actually be the best way to use tumblers.



< Message edited by suzanne -- 12/8/2010 5:55:48 AM >

(in reply to petepal)
Post #: 9
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 8:41:57 AM   
GuntherHess


Posts: 11470
Joined: 12/13/2004
From: Frederick Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

If a bottle looks like it's just come off the assembly line, how does one know if it didn't come off a assembly line?


reproduced bottles are almost never exactly like the originals and collectors can usually identify them with little trouble. There are a few passable fakes but they are a tiny percentage of the bottles on the market and not a big concern to most collectors.
Many old bottles are found in attics and other protected spaces and look exactly like they did when they rolled off the factory floor. These are the most sought after examples ("attic mint").
A tumbled bottle can be made to look much better but it can never be restored to mint condition.

_____________________________

FREE Online Medicine Guide -
http://www.antiquemedicines.com/MedicineNexus/Nexus.htm

Web Site - http://antiquemedicines.com

Email : mknapp@antiquemedicines.com

(in reply to petepal)
Post #: 10
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 11:42:04 AM   
Plumbata


Posts: 1657
Joined: 12/4/2007
Status: offline
I almost invariably prefer uncleaned bottles to cleaned ones. An "Old" looking old bottle is far more interesting, attractive and dynamic to me than a "New" looking old bottle. I collect coins and other similar things, and to clean a nice, decently valuable coin or ancient bronze or copper object would be both heretical to the goals of historic preservation, and idiotic in the realm of the marketplace. The reasoning behind and preference for cleaning bottles probably lies with its different and less-venerable development as a hobby. For a while, bottles were only considered to be psuedo-antiques, more like collectibles, and far inferior to antique furniture or coins or sculptures, for example (except by the few early scholars of glasshouses/pontiled flasks). Without the rigid standards (reflected by many years of realized prices) which guided collectors of other antiques to strive to maintain the natural patina, rockhounders-turned-bottle diggers/dealers probably approached a hazy bottle the same way they approached a rough gemstone; as something to be crafted and polished into a more superficially attractive item to be purchased by uninformed buyers more concerned with having a few elements in their windows to trigger some incorrect sense of ersatz nostalgia (or merely bought for the colors and shapes, deemed "pretty" by the purchasers) than concerned with having semi-contextualized elements of history (from the surface etching/deposits/wear) which can tell a far greater story than a cleaned bottle (was it tumbling around in sand for decades? or was it used for years as indicated by base wear? or was the soil it was excavated from high in this-or-that mineral content? or was this beer bottle last used as a container for laundry bluing?)

Perhaps another reason was that for a while, the supply of un-dug old bottles in basements and attics was enough to satisfy the demands of the early collectors, but when dug bottles started to enter the market those collectors who had amassed collections of generally mint bottles became annoyed when a few out of hundreds in their collection stood out by virtue of their superficial non-mintyness, and then sought to maintain uniformity via tumbling.



quote:

ORIGINAL: GuntherHess

quote:

sterilize it.


that's a new one on me



I have an old local hutch, sick and hazy as heck but the wire stopper and rubber gasket were in such excellent shape that someone uninitiated would think the stopper was less than 10 years old. The rubber was perfectly pliable so i got the idea to sterilize the bottle, decant some cola into it, and see if it would seal. It sealed perfectly, which was exciting, so i placed it in the fridge, allowed it to chill, then popped the seal and greedily consumed the soda, magically made far more delicious because it was issuing forth from a 100 year old local bottle.

Also sterilized an old, debossed 14 quart (or liter?) OP demi to use in the brewing of some tasty mead, but generally sterilization isn't an aesthetically necessary part of my bottle cleaning process.


_____________________________

Alterius non sit qui suus esse potest.



Advertisements contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper.

- Thomas Jefferson


(in reply to GuntherHess)
Post #: 11
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 3:13:48 PM   
rockbot


Posts: 3491
Joined: 6/17/2009
From: Hilo, Hawaii
Status: offline
I believe the hutch stopper is made with lead?

_____________________________

" Politicians are like diapers, they need to be changed often, and for the same reason"
Samuel Clemens

(in reply to Plumbata)
Post #: 12
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 4:10:32 PM   
GuntherHess


Posts: 11470
Joined: 12/13/2004
From: Frederick Maryland
Status: offline
I don’t think the preference to clean bottles has much to do with the sophistication level of collectors, there are certainly very sophisticated bottle collectors. I think it has more to do with the particular nature of glass. Some bottles look ok with an old even patina others have stain that masks the true beauty of the glass. The owner has the option of how they prefer their glass.

While modern coins are generally not cleaned, the majority of ancient coins have been cleaned in some way and it seems to be a generally accepted practice. Modern coins normally don’t need cleaned because most are not excavated.


_____________________________

FREE Online Medicine Guide -
http://www.antiquemedicines.com/MedicineNexus/Nexus.htm

Web Site - http://antiquemedicines.com

Email : mknapp@antiquemedicines.com

(in reply to Plumbata)
Post #: 13
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 7:26:36 PM   
cyberdigger


Posts: 12291
Joined: 11/29/2008
From: I 195 @ US 9, NJ USA
Status: online
If I had a tumbler, I'd only do the insides of the bottles.. that's usually where the ugliest stain is.. I don't mind a nice patina, or a matte finish, or opalescence, because these things make it look as old as it really is. I don't mind nice clean attic bottles either, but
the over-tumbling and shining em up like a mirror is not sitting well with me these days..

(in reply to GuntherHess)
Post #: 14
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 7:28:19 PM   
Plumbata


Posts: 1657
Joined: 12/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rockbot

I believe the hutch stopper is made with lead?



Hmm never thought about that, is it some sort of pewter that the gasket is attached to? Either way a little lead doesn't bother me. I play with depleted Uranium, caustic and poisonous chemicals, Mercury, and smoke cigarettes to boot so a few atoms of Pb in the soda certainly won't kill me, at least not before the other stuff does!


quote:

ORIGINAL: GuntherHess

I don’t think the preference to clean bottles has much to do with the sophistication level of collectors, there are certainly very sophisticated bottle collectors. The owner has the option of how they prefer their glass.


Hmm, that is not what I was going for but I understand where you are coming from. I was more musing about the potential reasons that tumbling started in the first place, decades before my birth. It is clear why people do it now, however, and naturally it is their option, as is shattering the bottle. Neither was I suggesting that bottle collecting and the collectors aren't respectable or sophisticated; it just seems that it wasn't really considered to be respectable until 50 years ago or less, and even presently some antiquarians scoff at old bottles.

I was reading a book from 1949 about finding treasures in truck and trash and the author, in the section on glasswares, indicates that plain bottles with pontil marks, pontiled decanters, pontiled flasks, and bitters bottles either with pontils or not, were of value. "There are bitters bottles worth one hundred dollars, whiskey bottles worth two hundred and fifty dollars (historical flasks or something else?), and drinking glasses worth one thousand dollars." Most of the emphasis is on non-bottle glasswares though.

It is interesting how now, the top prices paid for bitters bottles are damn near 1,000 times higher than those paid 61 years ago. I wonder if there are drinking glasses out there worth a million dollars currently? Regardless, it shows rather well how far this hobby has developed and expanded over relatively short period of time. High-end bottles may indeed be a splendid hedge against inflation if in the next 60 years prices continue to rise dramatically and the hobby keeps growing (doubt anyone will be spending 100,000,000 on any American bottles in 6 decades, though that would be pretty sweet).

Perhaps someone a tad older than 23 can throw some wisdom and experience regarding the development of this hobby my way?


quote:

ORIGINAL: GuntherHess
I think it has more to do with the particular nature of glass. Some bottles look ok with an old even patina others have stain that masks the true beauty of the glass.


You provided a very telling indicator of why people may prefer tumbling; because of "stain that masks the true beauty of the glass". The reason I started collecting bottles when I was 5 was not because of the beauty of the superficial appearance of the glass, it was because of the beauty of the age and associated history indicated by the glass (and I just loved all sorts of bottles, old and new, because they were so magically useful in their sequestering of contents from the external environment). Typical aesthetics were, and are secondary to me, though certainly very important.

Perhaps this is where the division lies; some collectors see the bottles more as attractive works of art which should be allowed to shine and sparkle approximately as they would have just after manufacture (after the evidence of potential damage accrued over time is eliminated), and others may see them more as artifacts from an age long past, venerable by virtue of the age (and potential damages) that they show? Why else would there be such a deep rift of valid opinions?


quote:

ORIGINAL: GuntherHess
While modern coins are generally not cleaned, the majority of ancient coins have been cleaned in some way and it seems to be a generally accepted practice. Modern coins normally don’t need cleaned because most are not excavated.


Decent point, but the highest value coins are generally the ones which require the least cleaning, or nothing but a rinse. Often ancient coins come out in splendid shape, and they are not tossed in with the 1-2 dollar bulk lots of tumbler-scoured crusty roman bronzes because they are far more desirable as-is. It is generally accepted in part because after the dissolution of the Soviet bloc some profiteers had amassed millions of uncleaned excavated coins and they had to find a way to make them appealing enough to sell to the widest number of people possible. Many people who own ancient coins have no other numismatic interests, so having a bunch of hokey-looking cleaned bronzes presents no problem to them or the opening of their wallets. If it makes money, then naturally it is generally accepted, but it doesn't automatically make it a preferable practice. The majority of ancient coins that are cleaned in this way are the least valuable, most common examples which are not particularly desirable by actual collectors. Likewise, I doubt many coin collectors would care much if you polished up some wheatback pennies on a burnishing wheel, but if you did the same to a nice 1652 Pine Tree Shilling those same collectors would be looking to string you up on the nearest coniferous tree! If you've seen uncleaned ancient bronze (the kind that then gets cleaned), then the carbonate and dirt deposits are commonly so severe that the coin is entirely unattributable. This is not really an issue with old American bottles, not this millennium anyway.



To switch gears slightly, would you carry your assertion that since these ancient Roman bottles/containers possess "stain that masks the true beauty of the glass" they should be tumbled clean and smooth, along with more recent excavated hand-blown American glass (provided they wouldn't break, in this scenario)? Or are they more "artifacts" than "art" which should have the patinated "context" preserved?








_____________________________

Alterius non sit qui suus esse potest.



Advertisements contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper.

- Thomas Jefferson


(in reply to GuntherHess)
Post #: 15
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/8/2010 7:52:53 PM   
GuntherHess


Posts: 11470
Joined: 12/13/2004
From: Frederick Maryland
Status: offline
I would never argue that every bottle, or any bottle for that matter, should be cleaned. I think its up to the owner to decide what they want to do with them. I have some tumbled bottles and some stained bottles in my collection. I decide about cleaning on a bottle-by-bottle basis.
There was a time when people were cleaning bottles by dipping in hydrofluoric acid. It gave bottles a very unnatural look not to mention being dangerous. Tumbling was certainly an improvement in cleaning technology. Who knows, in 20 years tumbling might be considered an undesirable method. I do predict people will still be cleaning bottles by some method whatever that might be.

< Message edited by GuntherHess -- 12/8/2010 7:53:31 PM >


_____________________________

FREE Online Medicine Guide -
http://www.antiquemedicines.com/MedicineNexus/Nexus.htm

Web Site - http://antiquemedicines.com

Email : mknapp@antiquemedicines.com

(in reply to Plumbata)
Post #: 16
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/9/2010 5:36:43 AM   
suzanne

 

Posts: 689
Joined: 3/29/2009
Status: offline
I don't think they are made of lead because they get rusty.

(in reply to rockbot)
Post #: 17
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/9/2010 5:42:50 AM   
suzanne

 

Posts: 689
Joined: 3/29/2009
Status: offline
Hutch stoppers I mean.  

(in reply to suzanne)
Post #: 18
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/9/2010 8:19:33 AM   
epackage


Posts: 9800
Joined: 5/3/2009
From: Jersey
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdigger

If I had a tumbler, I'd only do the insides of the bottles.. that's usually where the ugliest stain is.. I don't mind a nice patina, or a matte finish, or opalescence, because these things make it look as old as it really is. I don't mind nice clean attic bottles either, but
the over-tumbling and shining em up like a mirror is not sitting well with me these days..

as usual Charlie and I are on the same page, I was thinking the same thing the other day Charlie while going thru some bottles....Jim

_____________________________

I WANT PATERSON NJ BOTTLES !!

Being NICE for the SAKE of OTHERS !!!

(in reply to cyberdigger)
Post #: 19
RE: Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning - 12/9/2010 8:30:05 AM   
epackage


Posts: 9800
Joined: 5/3/2009
From: Jersey
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: suzanne

I don't think they are made of lead because they get rusty.

From Hutchbook.com


The Hutchinson Stopper is made very strong; the spring being of heavy tinned brass wire, which is not liable to break or get out of place from hard usage. Unlike the other stoppers made, which, in order to save time and money, are too light to stand hard usage, or the hinged or jointed stopper, which is easily broken or becomes unjointed inside of the bottle making them useless, and almost impossible to extract them from the bottle

http://hutchbook.com/Bottling%20Hutch%20Stopper%20Repair/Default.htm

_____________________________

I WANT PATERSON NJ BOTTLES !!

Being NICE for the SAKE of OTHERS !!!

(in reply to suzanne)
Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Bottle Forums] >> Cleaning and Repairing >> Cleaning bottles vs professional cleaning Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Antique Bottles

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.383