jwschaeffer
Posts: 140
Joined: 9/4/2006 From: Port Carbon, PA Status: offline
|
I know this is now a pretty dead subject but I wanted to share this letter I got from a member of Sub Sea Research from Maine (subsearesearch.com): Regarding the collection of Glass Naval Boarding-grenades as listed onEbay, (links submitted by John Schaefer), I have the following opinions,Whatever it may be worth. The one thing about old glass, it is just about impossible to verify byJust a photograph whether or not an item is authentic or not. It isCertainly impossible to date the glass from a composition perspective,(i.e. Mineral content). Nowadays anything can be reproduced exactly,Expecially glass items. What makes me doubt the claim of originality is the complete lack ofProvenance for each item! As you may be well aware, Maine has some veryStrict laws regarding shipwreck salvage & artifact recovery. And ifThese items had originated form a shipwreck site in Maine, there shouldBe a very large trail of paperwork regarding the exact provenance ofEach item available from the State of Maine, available either throughThe State archaeologist or one of the State Universities. And I DOUBTVERY MUCH that either sourcing would condone any ebay selling of suchItems as they are extremely rare in perfect and intact forms. Regarding the contemporary glass forms, they do appear to be exactAccording to known contemporary glass grenade-forms dating between the16th-19th century, and could originate from just about any nationalityOf vessel, most probably a warship as merchants very rarely if everWould have carried such weapons. My guess would be a privateer orLetter-of-marque. Maine rivers were good hiding places during theAmerican Revolution for such vessels, and it is documented that severalSuch vessels were scuttled in Maine rivers during both the RevolutionAND the War of 1812. Again... It is the lack of PROVENANCE of such items that I question moreThan the contemporary accuracy of each piece. Without such provenance, IWould have to assume that the validity of such pieces are indeedFraudulent. Whats more is that according to the ebay pieces, theParticular stabilization laboratory is not identified, and if these wereLegitimate recoveries and items, there should be no problem inIdentifying the shipwreck from which they originated, nor any suchProblem in identifying the particular STATE AUTHORIZED laboratory! Final analysis... Yes, until PROVENANCE and IDENTITY OF THE LABORATORYSOURCE, we have to assume that the items are indeed fake. Best;Ed.
|