SODAPOPBOB
Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010 Status: offline
|
nksave46 ~ I should have pointed this out on the title page, and address it now so there will be no confusion hereafter ... but we (you and I and everyone) may need to be reminded there are variations upon variations of some bottles ... meaning that a "Tom Tucker" from 1950 would not be as rare/valuable as one from 1938. Which is not to say that either of our's is not rare and valuable, (and I honestly believe they are) but rather as a reminder to emphasize this distinction. In other words; the main thing here is the sharing of our favorite acls that are the rarest in our own particular collections, and hopefully are equally as rare on a overall basis. So if the case had been that my "Tom Tucker" was a 1950 example and only worth, say $25.00, this would not demean it whatsoever as it is still personal favorite and personal rarest. Rarity does not always translate into a higher value. But demand does! For example: There may be only ten 1938 "Tom Tucker's" out there, which are extemely rare, but if no one is interested in purchasing them, they would be difficult to sell for even $10.00. But if you take a bottle like a certain Mt. Dew bottle that there are hundreds of, but have ten thousand collectors that just have to have one, then they will easily go for in the hundreds of dollars. I hope I explained this so called Supply/Demand phenomenon correctly, and even if I didn't I truly hope you get my point. I love your 'White' variation of the "Tom Tucker" and under different circumstances would gladly pay top dollar for it! And I want to apologize for sometimes sounding like a dictionary ... but I guess that's just how my goofy brain works these days. Thank you so much for sharing. And please, everyone, keep 'em comming! SPB
|