Antique-Bottles.Net logo
If you are just visiting and found the information you were looking for please contribute to the running costs by making a donation.
Forums : : Register : : Log In : : Log Out : : Help : : Calendar : : Search


Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
 
All Forums >> [Bottle Forums] >> Sodas - Embossed, Paper Label and ACLs. >> Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 5:15:52 PM   
morbious_fod

 

Posts: 4020
Joined: 3/4/2007
From: The backwoods of the backwoods, Virginia
Status: offline
Flittering around the bay just now and found this item. It appears to be using a Teem bottle design, but has a never before seen by me acl on the shoulder. Was this actually an attempt by Pepsi to make the Mountain Dew bottles fit the rest of their line, and was abandoned, or is this a fake created by someone with a Teem bottle and money on their minds? The guy seems to have a huge reserve on this as I bid just over $150 and didn't even crack it.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Extremely-Rare-10-oz-Mountain-Dew-bottle-1965-NICE-/130471424449?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e60b3f1c1







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by morbious_fod -- 1/3/2011 5:16:53 PM >


_____________________________

My website chronicling the soda bottling companies of the Southwest Virginia or Northeast Tennessee area including Bluefield, Princeton, and Rock West Virginia www.tazewell-orange.com

NEW ARTICLES: Just say Mil-Kay the story of Mil-K-Botl
Post #: 1
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 6:37:42 PM   
fishnuts


Posts: 513
Joined: 8/5/2010
Status: offline
Speaking from the point of view of a screen printer (for 54 months) the pair of screen for this artwork is going to run well over $100.  At least in Arkansas...and in the late 90's.  That's just for the screen creation.  The artwork itself has to come from somewhere and that cost money.  Then one would need the specialized screen printing machine that does cylinder bottle shapes.  And a dryer.  And the oven for annealing the paint onto the glass.  Money, money and more money.
One would have to make at least two dozen to make it worthwhile.  In this hobby, we all know, if a cluster of  previously unknown bottles turns up, that the first one is high then not so much for each one after that.  And because  the bottle is no longer deemed rare if a case, or more, turns up.   It doesn't seem a sensible  enterprise to me.  Lots of front-end labor with not much payoff on the back end.  Plus gaining the eternal enmity of all bottle collectors (as if a dirt bag counterfeiter cares what his marks think).

I know absolutely nothing about the 'real'ness of this bottle, but I posit that one would be loopy to try and pull off a fake like this.
I was planning to call the seller anyway...I'll let ya'll know what he knows about it...unless he's on here...then I'll ask him to tell us.



_____________________________

...trading anything I got for anything I want more...especially from Arkansas and the South

(in reply to morbious_fod)
Post #: 2
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 6:53:17 PM   
morbious_fod

 

Posts: 4020
Joined: 3/4/2007
From: The backwoods of the backwoods, Virginia
Status: offline
I realize that Fish, that's why I also put forth that this is possibly a previously unknown prototype that Pepsi produced to make the brand blend in with the bottle style that permeates the rest of it's line during this period. I personally can't stand Pepsi bottles from this period, so I'm glad they didn't go with this. On top of that the font and the hillbilly used are the ones used on the later "laughing pig" bottle design, which tells me that even at this early date of 1965 they were already working on replacing the Hartman design, which gives me more proof that this is a prototype. Also the bottle looks to have never been used. That's why I placed a $150 dollar bid, the pro-real points greatly out number the cons, but I just don't have the money to blow a thousand dollars on an unknown bottle. I doubt that there will be more for the same reason, if there are more they will be far and few between. This one has the potential to reach the price range of a party jug.

_____________________________

My website chronicling the soda bottling companies of the Southwest Virginia or Northeast Tennessee area including Bluefield, Princeton, and Rock West Virginia www.tazewell-orange.com

NEW ARTICLES: Just say Mil-Kay the story of Mil-K-Botl

(in reply to fishnuts)
Post #: 3
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 6:55:18 PM   
fishnuts


Posts: 513
Joined: 8/5/2010
Status: offline
...so, why can't it possible that it is neither prototype, or fraud?
I'd be interested to know if these were overprints.  Possibly some bottle maker or bottler has thousands of Teem bottles and made secondary use out of them.  Creating this interesting item, and the puzzle it represents.


_____________________________

...trading anything I got for anything I want more...especially from Arkansas and the South

(in reply to morbious_fod)
Post #: 4
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 7:55:08 PM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
Mainly just tagging thread and posting photo of a 1960s "Teem" bottle for easy comparison. But while I'm here I thought I would, as Morb touched on, (and according to my sources,) mention that on December 30, 1965, PepsiCo, Inc. officially became the owner of the Mountain Dew trademark. I mention this "just in case" the bottle in question turns out to have an earlier date on the bottom. Unless I missed something, I didn't see in the e-bay description where a "specific" date was indicated.

Hey Morb ~

If December 30, 1965 is in fact the official date for the acquisition of the trademark after dissolving "The Tip Corporation of America," is it feasible that PepsiCo would already be messing around with prototypes or "any type" of new bottle design? And when I stop and think about it, I guess that is what this thread is all about and trying to determine.

Final Question :  Do we know for sure that the bottle is marked 1965 on the base?

I hope I didn't muddy the waters here with too many unanswerable questions, and mis-information. If so, my apologies.

Thanks,    

SPBOB

Notice on this original Teem bottle that the dots are higher up on the neck. Not that this tells us anything, but rather just an observation.



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SODAPOPBOB -- 1/3/2011 8:00:33 PM >

(in reply to fishnuts)
Post #: 5
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 7:59:11 PM   
cyberdigger


Posts: 12311
Joined: 11/29/2008
From: I 195 @ US 9, NJ USA
Status: online
Couldn't it just be a rare bottle? Perhaps less than 145 produced? Looks legit to me.. and you all know what an expert on ACL's I am..

(in reply to SODAPOPBOB)
Post #: 6
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 8:02:32 PM   
madman


Posts: 10369
Joined: 2/5/2005
Status: offline
hey morb looks real to me very nice!

_____________________________

always looking for, Toledo Ohio, Knoxville Tn. milks pharms and sodas,

(in reply to cyberdigger)
Post #: 7
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 8:16:48 PM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
I honestly think it's real, too. But just for the heck of it I just this minute sent the seller the following copy/pasted message. I will let you know what he has to say if/when I hear back from him. And even though I think it's real, it just strikes me as totally odd that PepsiCo would be making bottles marked 1965 that they didn't even have a copyright to until December 30, 1965. Maybe they made it on December 31st ... ???

SPBOB

Message sent to seller ...

Dear bottler,

The bottom of you bottle should have an embossed date code that might look something like this ... 21 <(I)> 65 Could you please check it for confirmation of what is embossed on the bottom, even if different than the above?

Thank you,

RCB



< Message edited by SODAPOPBOB -- 1/3/2011 8:20:33 PM >

(in reply to madman)
Post #: 8
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 9:06:34 PM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
Morb ~

How certain are we/you regarding the transition date from the "side-by-side" application of the words Mountain Dew on their earlier bottles vs. the "over-under" application that apparently didn't start until 1968? The e-bay seller's bottle is "over-under." I know you already touched on this, but are there hard facts to establish the transition?  "If" it is a fake, this may be where the counterfeiter messed up! ???

SPBOB  

(in reply to SODAPOPBOB)
Post #: 9
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 9:37:50 PM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
                      I just heard back from the e-bay seller. Here is his reply copy/pasted ...

     Hello. On the bottom is LG 65 and underneath that is 25. That is all the numbers on the bottom.  James

(in reply to morbious_fod)
Post #: 10
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/3/2011 10:18:18 PM   
fishnuts


Posts: 513
Joined: 8/5/2010
Status: offline
I phoned the seller a few moments ago.
The seller said this bottle came from a find 17 years ago( did not elaborate on where, etc.).  Since it had no city...and he has no experience or interest(collects picture labels only...but would not take my Orchard in trade)) in MD, it just sat.  And sat.  Six years ago a Texas (unnamed) collector heard of it and offered him, well..a lot (unspecified).  He turned the offer down.
It is not an overprint, he said, as best as he can tell.  It's in super good condition.  Doesn't know the origin.
Hopefully expects a price in the value range morb stated.

Good Luck Dew Hounds.



_____________________________

...trading anything I got for anything I want more...especially from Arkansas and the South

(in reply to morbious_fod)
Post #: 11
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 2:02:19 AM   
splante


Posts: 1213
Joined: 5/25/2010
From: RI
Status: offline
could be legit but sounds fishy , too many red flags. The copyright and mountain dew transaction questions would keep me away from it for now.

(in reply to fishnuts)
Post #: 12
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 11:10:08 AM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
I just upped the bid to $200.00 ... but reserve still not reached.  Should I / Would you go to $500.00 ??? 

                    And here is the generic bid confirmation I just received from e-bay ... 

So far, so good! Your bid has been confirmed, and you are the high bidder. It's almost yours, but you could still be outbid. You can improve your chances of winning by increasing your bid.

< Message edited by SODAPOPBOB -- 1/4/2011 11:13:51 AM >

(in reply to splante)
Post #: 13
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 11:29:34 AM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
        I'm Convinced!
                              It's a Prototype!

< Message edited by SODAPOPBOB -- 1/4/2011 11:33:54 AM >

(in reply to SODAPOPBOB)
Post #: 14
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 6:28:20 PM   
morbious_fod

 

Posts: 4020
Joined: 3/4/2007
From: The backwoods of the backwoods, Virginia
Status: offline
Here's the reason I think it it a prototype. First off if there were a gross (100 pcs) ordered even as a re-purposed bottles one of these should have already surfaced with the sheer amount of Mountain Dew hillbilly bottle collectors out there. If there was an actual production run of several grosses then the possibility of one surfacing before now increases greatly. There are very few unknown bottles in Mountain Dew bottles, there are some that we even know should exist; however, haven't seen the light of day yet. Most of these are from the pre-Pepsi period. Basically it's condition appears to have never been put through a bottling line, it sports a later previously unknown design using the later "Pepsi Hillbilly" in a much earlier period, the transition to the new Pepsi hillbilly tends to be around 67 or 68. It's not the fact that the words Mountain Dew are over and under, there is a change in the font from a thinner to a fatter font between the two logos, check out the W and the dot on the eye between the two, they are similar but very different. Pepsi acquired the Tip Corporation (Mountain Dew and all) in 1964, according to the Wall Street Journal article from September 9, 1964, also Marion Bottling Company (a Pepsi bottler) first picked up the brand in 1965.

It just looks too good to be a fake; however, it could still be one. I do think Fish is right that the cost would be prohibitive. Could this be a prototype made for a single bottler, that is possible, but the use of the later Pepsi Hillbilly during the Hartman Hillbilly period is odd. This thing is going to hit the roof, and I don't blame the seller for turning down your trade. If this is real it will reach the Party Jug levels in value.

As for whether or not to take a chance, this is one of one so far and no provenance or other proof of it's authenticity has been seen. Buyer beware.


< Message edited by morbious_fod -- 1/4/2011 6:32:08 PM >


_____________________________

My website chronicling the soda bottling companies of the Southwest Virginia or Northeast Tennessee area including Bluefield, Princeton, and Rock West Virginia www.tazewell-orange.com

NEW ARTICLES: Just say Mil-Kay the story of Mil-K-Botl

(in reply to SODAPOPBOB)
Post #: 15
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 6:44:24 PM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
Morb ~
I apologize for hogging so much air time here, but since I have decided to dip into my savings and take a shot at the bottle, I was hoping you wouldn’t mind my exuberence and grant me a little leeway here. I realize it is still a bit of a crap shoot as to whether the bottle is original and genuine, but based on everything I have been able to ascertain at the present, I am 100% convinced it is the real deal.

Some may ask, if I intend to try and be the highest bidder, why draw any more attention to it than necessary? Wouldn’t it be better to just let it alone and see what happens? My reply to this is that I am intentionally trying to attract attention to it! I want someone to break the reserve so I (and numerous others) will know exactly where we stand. I never did like that reserve business anyway, but suppose there may be advantages to it that I am not aware of. Personally, I think a seller should just establish a minimum starting price and let the chips fall where they may.

I won’t go into detail as to how much I intend to bid, but suffice it to say that I feel we may very well be looking at the next “Holy Grail” of acl soda bottles. My philosophy at the moment is to “shoot first” and then ask questions and do the research on it afterwards. If it turns out to be a fluke of some kind, then so be it. But I am willing to take that gamble on what I presently feel is a 80% possibility of it being a genuine prototype that for one reason or another just never made it’s way into full production.

And for those who have been following this thread with the same measure of interest that I have, I’d like to share the following article I came across recently regarding part of the transition period when the Mountain Dew brand was becoming a PepsiCo product. I am not entirely sure what year(s) the article is referring to, but I believe it was either in the late 1950s or very early 1960s. And the part I would like to focus on is near the end where it talks about Bill Jones “testing” different formulas. I know it is talking about testing the flavor formula itself and not a new bottle design, but it may be a clue that suggest the possibility that other forms of experimentation (including a new bottle design) were being conducted during this same time period. Thus, as Morb brought to light during the very onset of this thread, that the bottle could very well have been a prototype. And that’s good enough for me!

Morb : Thanks again for allowing me to participate in this most interesting topic, and especially for bringing it to our attention in the first place. Now that’s what I call sharing.
 
Your “Buyer Beware” recommendation is duly noted! Thanks.

SODAPOPBOB

{Article} / {Slightly edited for clarity}

When Bill Jones took over the Tip Corporation, and in order to finance his new enterprise, he needed investors, so he offered shares in the new company to some of his bottler friends. The original investors were Pepsi-Cola bottlers: Herman Minges of Lumberton, North Carolina; Richard Minges of Fayetteville, North Carolina; Allie Hartman of Knoxville, Tennessee; and Wythe Hull of Marion, Virginia.

Using Wythe Hull's Pepsi-Cola bottling facility in Marion, Virginia as a base of operations, Jones began testing different formulas. Employees at the Marion Pepsi plant were the first to sample each new version of the drink. Finally, one mixture seemed to have the right taste.

IS IT POSSIBLE THE BOTTLE CAME FROM OR WAS CONNECTED IN SOME WAY TO THE MARION, VIRGINIA BOTTLING PLANT ?






 
 
 



< Message edited by SODAPOPBOB -- 1/4/2011 6:50:13 PM >

(in reply to morbious_fod)
Post #: 16
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 6:58:43 PM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
I just upped the bid to $300.00 and the reserve is still not met!  Dang it! 

(in reply to SODAPOPBOB)
Post #: 17
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 7:25:33 PM   
morbious_fod

 

Posts: 4020
Joined: 3/4/2007
From: The backwoods of the backwoods, Virginia
Status: offline
Like you need permission to post. I started the tread to discuss this possible new exciting find in the brand's history.

Bill Jones did modify the formula in the early 1960's; however, not the bottle. I had always kinda wondered why Pepsi kept the straight side Mountain Dew bottle design when they produced nearly every other offering in either a swirl (Pepsi, Diet Pepsi, etc) or the diamond pattern design (Patio, Teem, etc), this bottle shows that it is very possible that they did indeed try to modify the Mountain Dew bottles to fit in with the rest of the line, but ultimately decided against it. This bottle is a very interesting find that expands the story of the brand. It would be nice to have one, but I don't think I am willing to take that much of a chance, just in case this is a hoax.


_____________________________

My website chronicling the soda bottling companies of the Southwest Virginia or Northeast Tennessee area including Bluefield, Princeton, and Rock West Virginia www.tazewell-orange.com

NEW ARTICLES: Just say Mil-Kay the story of Mil-K-Botl

(in reply to SODAPOPBOB)
Post #: 18
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 7:27:15 PM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
While we are waiting to see what develops (3 days 19 hours left) I could use a little help on something. I am trying to determine what year the "Teem" bottles (if they ever did) started showing up with the dots on the lower part of the neck as seen on the Mountain Dew prototype in question? The two bottles below are {left} 1962 and {right} 1969. The only example of a "low dot" bottle I have been able to find was on the gono.com site, and that was a barely discernable black and white photo.

If anyone has an example(s) of a Teem "low dot" bottle, please check the date(s) and let us know what you come up with. This may not tell us anything specific, other than the possibility of giving us some idea of just how many of these so called "low dot" bottles that went into production. If it turns out there are zero or very few, it may be a clue of some kind to aid in future research.

Thanks a lot,

SPBOB

Teem 1962 (no dots) & 1969 (high dots)

Reminder ... We are looking for "low dot" examples. Thanks.    




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SODAPOPBOB -- 1/4/2011 7:31:12 PM >

(in reply to SODAPOPBOB)
Post #: 19
RE: Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? - 1/4/2011 9:13:38 PM   
SODAPOPBOB

 

Posts: 3678
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
In answer to my own question, I just found this example of a Teem bottle that is currently on e-bay and has the "low dot" acl application I was referring to. I lucked out in that the seller's discription said it was embossed on the bottom  LCW63  2  (No doubt they misread the G and thought it was a C). Which most of us know translates ... Laurens Glass Works 1963. And which we also know is what the Mt. Dew/Teem bottle has on the base ... LG65 (1965).

I am not exactly sure where I am going with us, or what it might and might not reveal, but at least we now know that the Laurens Glass Works is a legitimate maker of PepsiCo bottles, and that the "low dot" acls were certainly available at least as early as 1963.

My next task will be to try and determine if there are 1965 "low dot" bottles. And hopefully with the help from members here we may be able to determine just when the dots migrated to the upper part of the neck. Of course, if there are multiple-multiple variations, then my search here may be in vain.

The main thing I'm attempting to determine here is if the dots were on the Mountain Dew/Teem bottle intentionally or just happened to be there when the Mt. Dew label was applied?  We know the bottle is obviously a Pepsi/Teem bottle, but it just strikes me odd that PepsiCo (even if this was a prototype experiment) would use the dots on an already established design. "Or" (if it is a fake) that the alleged counterfeiter just forgot to remove the dots when he "scraped off" the Teem acl?

      So back to my request ... I am currently looking for a 1965 Teem bottle with "low dots."

(If this is driving you nuts, just think of the scrambled eggs that are cooking inside of my head)

                                                          Thanks again

                                                             SPBOB

TEEM LGW63

    




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SODAPOPBOB -- 1/4/2011 9:15:55 PM >

(in reply to SODAPOPBOB)
Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Bottle Forums] >> Sodas - Embossed, Paper Label and ACLs. >> Possilbe prototype Mountain Dew bottle or hoax? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Antique Bottles

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.172