chosi
Posts: 30
Joined: 2/25/2008 Status: offline
|
I disagree that the paint was original. Here's my argument: 1) The debossed name "ARNY & SHINN" would have indicated ownership of the bottle 2) They were in business from circa-1855 until 1871, and there weren't many bottlers in Washington DC back then, so there wasn't much competition to be stealing bottles (I know that in the later 1800s the opposite is true, and I've seen many articles in the historic Washington Post about bottlers suing each other because of using each others bottles) 3) I have another bottle just like it, but it says "ARNY & SHINN / SUPERIOR / ROOT BEER", and there is no sign of paint on that bottle. 4) The paint had little flowers on it - would that have been a good advertisement for mead in the 1850s/1860s? Also, did they have deposits on bottles back then? The earliest evidence I've seen on a bottle deposit is on an 1890s receipt, where the bottler paid 1/13th of a penny for every bottle returned.
_____________________________
- Chosi _________________________________ See my website at www.chosi.org
|