Vernors Ginger Ale 150th B-Day

Welcome to our Antique Bottle community

Be a part of something great, join today!

hemihampton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
9,140
Reaction score
6,160
Points
113
Keith also had the same bottle as the one you pictured above but 3VernorsKeithsCloseup.jpg with a paper label but no codes on bottle. Pictured below on far left. LEON.
 

SODABOB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
481
Points
83
According to Keith's Post #478

This Bottle ...

Vernor's Bottles Keith.jpg

Goes with this Base ...

Vernor's Bottles Base Keith.jpg

Goes with this description ...

"The bottle on the left only has embossing on the bottom of the bottle. The third photo is what that looks like."

Slightly Edited:

"The bottle on the left only has embossing on the bottom. The third photo is what the base looks like."






 

SODABOB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
481
Points
83
P.S.

I expect Keith will be along eventually and will clarify things for us - but the way I understand what he's saying is ...

1. The only embossing is on the base of the bottle

2. There are no codes or any other type of embossing anywhere on the bottle.

Which, if accurate, makes it a strong contender for a super early bottle and possibly one of, if not the very first ... ???
 

SODABOB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
481
Points
83
And there's this I forgot about that pertains to the same bottle being discussed ...

"The fourth and fifth photos are the top of that bottle. Again, I'm no bottle expert. But, from what I've learned during this discussion, this looks like the seam ends and there has been a totally different top applied. In fact, even the quality of the glass looks very different."

Vernor's Bottle Keith Top Tooled Weird.jpg



 

SODABOB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
481
Points
83
And no VGA Monogram anywhere on the bottle!


( Which I think we all agree came later )
 

SODABOB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
481
Points
83
But let's not forget, this C.G. CO. 14-B bottle doesn't have the VGA monogram, either ...

Vernor's C.G. CO. Bottle.jpg

Vernor's C.G. CO. Bottle base.jpg
 

hemihampton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
9,140
Reaction score
6,160
Points
113
According to Keith's Post #478

This Bottle ...

View attachment 175110

Goes with this Base ...

View attachment 175111

Goes with this description ...

"The bottle on the left only has embossing on the bottom of the bottle. The third photo is what that looks like."

Slightly Edited:

"The bottle on the left only has embossing on the bottom. The third photo is what the base looks like."







YES,That's the same bottle I posted.
 

SODABOB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
481
Points
83
I think the missing link might be found by determining when the VGA~MONOGRAM was first used ? / trademark ?
 
Last edited:

hemihampton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
9,140
Reaction score
6,160
Points
113
Found this in the April 1896 Western Druggist. Vernor's selling & closing his Druggist Business. Why? Because he was moving closer to downtown to concentrate full time on his Booming Ginger Ale Business with the opening of a Bottling dept. & new bigger building. Which eventually expanded to take over the whole block.VernorsApril1896.jpgLEON.
 

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.

Latest threads

Forum statistics

Threads
83,324
Messages
743,597
Members
24,353
Latest member
Hayden.Brown
Top