1700's? amethyst jug

Welcome to our Antique Bottle community

Be a part of something great, join today!

nz bottla

Member
Joined
May 24, 2014
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Points
0
[attachment=131_1916.JPG] [attachment=131_1920.JPG] [attachment=131_1922.JPG] Hi everyone, I recently picked up this beautiful deep amethyst jug/ decanter from a local antique shop, the guy I bought it from told me it was from the late 1700's and English in origin. Do any of you think you might be able to help me determine if this a genuine article? Many thanks, Caleb.
 

Attachments

  • 1ccd9f5880d041e8961b8265fbb787ec.jpg
    1ccd9f5880d041e8961b8265fbb787ec.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 61
  • 844efc57c7bc403d91e8df4f7e6d601f.jpg
    844efc57c7bc403d91e8df4f7e6d601f.jpg
    55.8 KB · Views: 59
  • 267b1bcc870146e09bf12c32466a7e3e.jpg
    267b1bcc870146e09bf12c32466a7e3e.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 61

cowseatmaize

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2004
Messages
12,387
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Northeastern USA
Hi, Is your nz meaning your in New Zealand? I'm doubting the age myself. Maybe it's just the image but it looks like more modern glass reproduction from a museum or something.Is that an engraved "M" at about 12:30 in the base picture and is there more?
 

nz bottla

Member
Joined
May 24, 2014
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hi thanks for your reply, Yes I was doubting the authenticity myself, of course the guy I bought it from told me it was the real deal and he has dealt with items from the period for years, maybe the reason why there aren't many imperfections with it is because more time was put into creating it than with a normal bottle as perhaps it was used in stately homes? I'm not too sure either way, but it is definitely hand blown and the glass is very thin. The 'm' is just a reflection and the other markings are irregularities in the glass. Yes I am from New Zealand. Regards, Caleb.
 

cowseatmaize

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2004
Messages
12,387
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Northeastern USA
The color may have been used for the "stately homes" but if someone was going for that market I think they would have added some more detail also, or at least make the handle more even and fancier. The craftsmen were around but it was time consuming and expensive.My opinion is no earlier that 1940 but couldn't tell you where it was made. I hope you didn't pay much or can get your money back if you find out for sure.It's still a nice color and a few flowers would look great in it.
 

epgorge

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
2,793
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
USA
I agree with Cows... that it is 20th century. It is nicely crafted but that color while reminiscent of a puce, just doesn't look right to me. Also, it is remiss of any base wear. If it were from the 1700's it would have more wear on the bottom. At first I wondered if it were a wine decanter but I would think it is a fancy vase. Huge open pontil. The handle attachment on the bottom of the handle doesn't appear to be tooled. I can't see the top attachment, though it does look as if it has some tooling marks on it. Does it have any residual in it that you can investigate? If you can figure out what the content was you may have a better idea of when it was produced. Nice piece regardless of age. Red is studying handle attachments. Perhaps, he can give you his opinion on it.Joel
 

2find4me

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
1,740
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Well Mate, would have fooled me too. Welcome to the forum.
 

epgorge

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
2,793
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
USA
It does have a Persian look to it, doesn't it? After thinking about it, why would a vase have a handle on it? Maybe a wine or mead. We are going on just a few pictures so you should have it checked out for authenticity.Joel
 

nz bottla

Member
Joined
May 24, 2014
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Thanks for your comments everyone, I will be taking it to the local collectables club next week to see what the members have to say, in natural sunlight it is much more of a purple colour than puce. It does have some sort of residue inside, but can't make out what it is. The lack of wear on the base had me worried too. Regards, Caleb.
131_1923.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
 

Attachments

  • 1317E276FD784D05921C3044C4510C51.JPG
    1317E276FD784D05921C3044C4510C51.JPG
    38.9 KB · Views: 60

epgorge

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
2,793
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
USA
Definitely more purple and now in that light it does look like newer glass.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Latest threads

Forum statistics

Threads
83,358
Messages
743,816
Members
24,376
Latest member
Ally_Mac
Top