SODAPOPBOB
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2010
- Messages
- 11,502
- Reaction score
- 49
- Points
- 0
RE: Correction
My primary reason for starting this thread was twofold ...
1. To identify and date the broken Coca Cola bottle.
2. To find the earliest date "marked/coded" Graham bottle patent 49,729
This thread was not intended to determine who had the most expertise in the field of soda bottle collecting, nor who published the most books. Of recent this thread has become the primary focus of the broken bottle which is not marked. I am currently attempting to point out that the "shoulder" design on the broken bottle and the Graham patent number 49,729 are distinctly different. I am also attempting to point our that the embossing on the two bottles is distinctly different as well. Thus, I am currently of the opinion that the two bottles are not the same.
Respectfully
Bob
My primary reason for starting this thread was twofold ...
1. To identify and date the broken Coca Cola bottle.
2. To find the earliest date "marked/coded" Graham bottle patent 49,729
This thread was not intended to determine who had the most expertise in the field of soda bottle collecting, nor who published the most books. Of recent this thread has become the primary focus of the broken bottle which is not marked. I am currently attempting to point out that the "shoulder" design on the broken bottle and the Graham patent number 49,729 are distinctly different. I am also attempting to point our that the embossing on the two bottles is distinctly different as well. Thus, I am currently of the opinion that the two bottles are not the same.
Respectfully
Bob