bottlebugs
Well-Known Member
Ever since I started collecting some 50 years ago there seems to have been this odd
school of thought...a full, capped, as found paper labeled soda bottle was more
expensive than any other version.
Yes I understand that fakes and replicas are undesirable, but why is there this stigma
about NOS labels and caps on original bottles? As an experienced collector I wonder why.
My first love was archeology and got to visit museums as a kid. Had I saw a display of the
Ark of the Covenant I would have messed my drawers.
It's basically a bottle with its original contents, capped and sealed. But it's not a hundred
year old soda bottle is it? It's thousands of years old and treasured by millions.
Now it is theorized that when it disappeared, the Philistines or the Assyrians made good
riddance of it. I'm sure it all got split up and sold to the highest bidder.
The solid gold lid (cap) went first. Maybe it was even melted down.
Then maybe the gold covered box went next. I have a Bobo stool that may have been
stripped of its gold. It's still a Bobo stool. Let's call this it's original label. It was removed
from the container which was just wood after all, and pretty much worthless.
Then the contents were sold off, and not really aging well anyway as the language etched
into it was constantly changing. It's believed it was written in Proto-Canaanite. Find that on
Google Translate!
Aaron's rod?Just a stick without Aaron. Even with Biblical Hebrew, I doubt you'd get it to work.
So if I find an original cap, NOS label and a period correct bottle that was scrubbed clean, and
filled it an old moldy soda, why would you pay a premium? I'd rather have a pristine NOS label
and cap, and a nice sparkling bottle to display for me and my friends. I'm not running a museum.
If I wanted to, I could split up the group and still make more money than the whole. Why then?
school of thought...a full, capped, as found paper labeled soda bottle was more
expensive than any other version.
Yes I understand that fakes and replicas are undesirable, but why is there this stigma
about NOS labels and caps on original bottles? As an experienced collector I wonder why.
My first love was archeology and got to visit museums as a kid. Had I saw a display of the
Ark of the Covenant I would have messed my drawers.
It's basically a bottle with its original contents, capped and sealed. But it's not a hundred
year old soda bottle is it? It's thousands of years old and treasured by millions.
Now it is theorized that when it disappeared, the Philistines or the Assyrians made good
riddance of it. I'm sure it all got split up and sold to the highest bidder.
The solid gold lid (cap) went first. Maybe it was even melted down.
Then maybe the gold covered box went next. I have a Bobo stool that may have been
stripped of its gold. It's still a Bobo stool. Let's call this it's original label. It was removed
from the container which was just wood after all, and pretty much worthless.
Then the contents were sold off, and not really aging well anyway as the language etched
into it was constantly changing. It's believed it was written in Proto-Canaanite. Find that on
Google Translate!
Aaron's rod?Just a stick without Aaron. Even with Biblical Hebrew, I doubt you'd get it to work.
So if I find an original cap, NOS label and a period correct bottle that was scrubbed clean, and
filled it an old moldy soda, why would you pay a premium? I'd rather have a pristine NOS label
and cap, and a nice sparkling bottle to display for me and my friends. I'm not running a museum.
If I wanted to, I could split up the group and still make more money than the whole. Why then?