kungfufighter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2005
- Messages
- 1,276
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 38
Allegedly, Marlena aka blueglass1 has the bottle that was given to the Queen. I'd like to see a pick of that, with the museum documentation. THAT would be some real evidence.
Really Jim? Not for me. Granny labels can be great fun and at times informative (if penned by Nina Fletcher Little, Lura Woodside Watkins, et al) but I have seen many such labels with obviously incorrect information and others that are simply faked. I'm of the opinion that one should always look at the object first and consider any ancillary information second. That's not to say that I necessarily discredit provenance, simply that one should primarily consider the object itself. Major publications by museum related authors (Barlow, Hunter and Barrett to name a few) contain numerous errors and some outright fabrications. Again, not questioning anyone or any specific object, simply saying that the written word alone, even with museum documentation is not necessarily the end all be all.
For what it's worth, I agree with Marlena and others that there is a clear distinction between to the so-called Persian saddle bottles (which I do think are "antiques") and the novelty junk that was at one time sold as "boarding weapons."