Archaeologists -vs- Marine Salvage

Welcome to our Antique Bottle community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ktbi

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
1,046
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Vacaville, Ca.
Another article on the debate with a little twist - ancient shipwrecks rather than privies. The comments section is the best with most agreeing finders keepers. I like the suggestion that the arch types be given the opportunity to study (a quick study) the site before the artifacts are sold - and they have the option of buying anything they want to study further! There should be a middle ground somewhere where all parties are happy enough, but in the end, the people who find the wreck should be entitled to keep what they find. Any abandoned ship at sea is fair game and should be the same for any ship under the sea. Ron

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/2009-01-25-sunken-treasure_N.htm?csp=34



Gold rush: The battle over sunken treasure


2006-science-snapshot-verga.gif




odysseyx.jpg

clear.gif


enlarge.gif
Enlarge
Odyssey Marine Exploration/AP

clear.gif


In this May 2007 photo, Odyssey's Remotely Operated Vehicle is recovered from the seabed after recovering coins from the Colonial period shipwreck "Black Swan."
[/align][/align][/align]

Shipwrecks! Treasure! Gold, gold, gold! The hallmarks of treasure-hunting are the stuff of adventure stories, more than fun enough to make archaeologists, who are mounting increasing complaints against the pillaging of sunken ships, seem like wet blankets.[/align]But more is at stake than just a few loose doubloons, they say. "The big picture is that a fair amount of humanity's past we don't know, and it's important we don't let it become lost forever," says maritime archaeologist James Delgado, head of the Institute of Nautical Archaeology.
The latest flashpoint comes with the recent premiere of the show Treasure Quest on cable's Discovery Channel (Thurs. 10 pm ET/PT), which follows deepwater exploration company Odyssey Marine Exploration as its teams explore two historic shipwrecks. Odyssey is in hot water with Spain over one of them, fighting it out in U.S. federal court over rights to the wreckage code-named the "Black Swan." Odyssey announced the discovery of the shipwreck site in 2007.
Odyssey says it recovered more than 500,000 silver and several hundred gold coins from the Black Swan wreck, some of which it intends to sell to finance its work.
An editorial in Archaeology magazine, published by the Archaeological Institute of America, charges that "the Discovery Channel is cashing in on the business of systematically looting shipwrecks" in teaming up with Odyssey. "The artifacts that Odyssey sells might inspire people to wonder about what life was like on board a ship a few hundred years ago when they played an integral role in the rise and fall of nations, but getting real answers about that history requires wrecks to be scientifically excavated and analyzed. The results have to be shared and debated so that they can become part of the historical and archaeological records. Otherwise the artifacts are just trinkets, conversation pieces, or decorative touches on the coffee tables of those who can afford them," writes the magazine's Zach Zorich.
FIND MORE STORIES IN: Baghdad | Italy | Mexico | Spain | Greece | Peru | Discovery Channel | Yale University | Convention | Scientific | Cultural Organization | National Geographic Channel | United Nations Educational | Incan | United States Government | Black Swan | Odyssey Marine Exploration | Classical | Archaeological Institute of America | James Delgado [/align]"Our series chronicles OME's exploration efforts, which yield valuable archaeological information," says Elizabeth Hillman, Discovery Channel's senior vice president of communications.
Greg Stemm, Odyssey CEO and co-founder, takes exception to Zorich's editorial, which he called "representative of the hubris of a small group of archaeologists who believe that anything in the popular media is beneath their standards."
Marine archaeologists, such as Delgado, complain that salvage firms like Odyssey rarely get around to publishing scholarly information on sites. Once sold, artifacts are effectively lost for study by future researchers. For example, archaeologists have analyzed in recent years decades-old discoveries of shipwreck amphora to determine what sort of wine Greece exported in the Classical era, around 500 B.C., impossible if the artifacts had been sold to collectors, he argues. The insight into ancient trade such findings provide are useful ones as economists today ponder the teetering of our own global economy.
Stemm counters that Odyssey does share the knowledge it gathers in articles, scientific papers, exhibits and TV shows. And, says Stemm, Odyssey only sells artifacts that have many duplicates and are of "very little archaeological interest."
All this comes as the AIA this month called for increased protection of sunken wrecks through a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) pact called the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. The AIA "urges ratification of the same by the United States Government at the earliest practicable moment." Signed by only 20 small countries, notably Spain and Mexico, the act went into effect on Jan. 2 and bars commercial salvage of shipwrecks and submerged ruins.
From legal disputes between Peru and Yale University over its collection of Incan antiquities, to Italy's high-profile pursuit of looted artifacts, to the headline-garnering sacking of the Iraq Museum in Baghdad, the public has gained some awareness of the damage that treasure hunters do to archaeology, says Delgado, who starred in National Geographic Channel series on underwater archaeology from 2000 to 2006. "But a double-standard seems to exist for underwater sites," he says. "Archaeologists just argue that a historical site is a historical site, no matter if it is wet or dry."
 

RED Matthews

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
4,898
Reaction score
6
Points
0
Location
Sarasota FL & Burdett NY
Hello ktbi, This is an interesting post. It is also a subject worth all of our considerations, but finders should be keepers in my book - things that need to be preserved for interested people - should be put in museums. The only problem I have found with that idea, is when the museum needs money for other purposes, they are not against selling something to get the funds for their objective. Thank you for your post. RED Matthews
 

ombudsman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Oklahoma
As much as most of us are interested in history, still, History is not the end-all and be-all of the universe. Scientists (and I'm thinking primarily of earth scientists and archeaologists) tend to think that their particular field of study is crucial to mankind. Granted, history is very interesting, and to a certain extent important (Those who do not remember the past...), but the aesthetic appreciation of historical objects (minerals, fossils, bottles) also has value.

Scientists would like for us to all worship scientific knowledge, in order to further their interests.
 

CALDIGR2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
2,278
Reaction score
6
Points
0
This has already been setteled in Spanish courts, with Oddysey the clear titleholder to all artifacts aboard the Black Swan. You will always find whiney archaeologists laying claim to any and all artifacts, whether they be found on land or at sea. So sad for them, but they would not even attempt to salvage deep water wrecks without sufficient "funding". Oddysey did it on their own and at considerable expense. They deserve to reap some benefit from this endeavor. Hell, the archys have around 2,000,000 amphorae in museums to study as it is. That's a piss-poor excuse and an example of how desperate they are.
 

BDD

Active Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Just another attempt by archaeologists to make salvage of anything old an immoral act. The argument that we "don't know" what shipboard life was like in those days and they need to study sunken wrecks to find out is just plain silly. It's the same with 19th century privies. We have a good written record of that period of history. What is immoral is their constant attempts at seizing the fruits of other people's labors. The people that funded that expedition, did the research, took all the risks, and salvaged that wreck deserve to keep the artifacts. Until very recently, the law of maritime salvage was basically finder's keepers on abandoned wrecks. The whole idea was that anything valuable laying on the bottom of the sea should be brought up and returned to the stream of commerce where it might do someone some good. And if you had the gumption to go out and locate and salvage an old wreck more power to you. This had been working well for the last few centuries, but now the archaeologists (and greedy governments) have turned salvors into greedy history rapers, etc., to further their own interests, as was pointed out in a previous post by ombudsman. I'm glad the courts ruled in favor of the odyssey.
 

tigue710

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
4,762
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
connecticut - nor cal
F'in archys... I'm actually a member of Odyssey, some how I hooked up with them years ago, I believe it was because they excavated a paddle wheeler full of bottles so I joined. I had a chance to invest with them, and still do I guess, but man do I wish I had before! My investment would of went to the search for the swan.... and they pay off would of been... well lets just say agreeable...

I still get their newsletters...
 

CALDIGR2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
2,278
Reaction score
6
Points
0
Same here, tigue. I got involved with them some years ago, probably about the same time. Not much return on my dollars, but maybe some day.
 

Members online

Latest threads

Forum statistics

Threads
83,447
Messages
744,408
Members
24,496
Latest member
AlexTheBottleHunter
Top