Steve/sewell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2010
- Messages
- 6,108
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 0
The Franklin Flask with no embosing is old, very old Dyott advertised his version in 1824 and again in 1826.
He purchased the entire out puts of the Olive,Gloucester,and the Union glass works begining in 1814 according to advertisments
in local papers which I have my possesion and have shown before here at the forum.Franklin Flasks were offered for sale
in the Bridgeton Observer Newspaper in 1812.I have seen this at the Cumberland count historical society on micro film.
Adeline Pepper an early glass and particularly new jersey early glass expert and collector had the actuall newspaper from 1812.
I beleive the Franklin quart GI-97 was made very early in a New Jersey glass works.
If you saw and held the flask in person you would see my rationale.When comparing the two side by side
The flask that I say is older reaks of early Jersey green aqua in color.As for the longevity of early heros the people of the colonial days
were no different than the folks of today in regaurds to political affiliation and how they thought which direction was better.
You have to remember just under half of the population during the revolutionary were loyal to the British.Dont think for a moment that
once the war was over bygones would be bygones.Established familys that were good honest hard working people and played by the rules
lost all of their personal possesions and left for England to escape ridicule and fear for their very lives.I do agree with you Jeff that the heros of that era
had more staying power but just like today they had their detractors all along.For the most part my theorys on when flasks were issued
is pretty solid.The newspapers of the day had a huge role in what was deemed important and of great interest.All of you have brought up good points in the flag flasks origons and dates of manufacture.Ill always accept privy dug dating techniques as pretty accurate.The Mckearins though were wrong about the Franklin flask being the same mold for the GI-96 and 97 When you compare them side by side they are quite different.A newspaper advertising them for sale in 1812 is good enough proof to me that the Franklin Flasks existed at that time
Mike, Lafayette flasks were offered by Dyott in 1824 The GI-90 and 91.I have the GI-91 and will post pictures when my back heals from all the shoveling of the last week.I dont feel like rumaging through the attic this evening but I promise I will pull it out.
He purchased the entire out puts of the Olive,Gloucester,and the Union glass works begining in 1814 according to advertisments
in local papers which I have my possesion and have shown before here at the forum.Franklin Flasks were offered for sale
in the Bridgeton Observer Newspaper in 1812.I have seen this at the Cumberland count historical society on micro film.
Adeline Pepper an early glass and particularly new jersey early glass expert and collector had the actuall newspaper from 1812.
I beleive the Franklin quart GI-97 was made very early in a New Jersey glass works.
If you saw and held the flask in person you would see my rationale.When comparing the two side by side
The flask that I say is older reaks of early Jersey green aqua in color.As for the longevity of early heros the people of the colonial days
were no different than the folks of today in regaurds to political affiliation and how they thought which direction was better.
You have to remember just under half of the population during the revolutionary were loyal to the British.Dont think for a moment that
once the war was over bygones would be bygones.Established familys that were good honest hard working people and played by the rules
lost all of their personal possesions and left for England to escape ridicule and fear for their very lives.I do agree with you Jeff that the heros of that era
had more staying power but just like today they had their detractors all along.For the most part my theorys on when flasks were issued
is pretty solid.The newspapers of the day had a huge role in what was deemed important and of great interest.All of you have brought up good points in the flag flasks origons and dates of manufacture.Ill always accept privy dug dating techniques as pretty accurate.The Mckearins though were wrong about the Franklin flask being the same mold for the GI-96 and 97 When you compare them side by side they are quite different.A newspaper advertising them for sale in 1812 is good enough proof to me that the Franklin Flasks existed at that time
Mike, Lafayette flasks were offered by Dyott in 1824 The GI-90 and 91.I have the GI-91 and will post pictures when my back heals from all the shoveling of the last week.I dont feel like rumaging through the attic this evening but I promise I will pull it out.