Just got back from an afternoon in the jungle. It was a rough one - got torn up twice by wasps. The first time were the smaller boonie bees - 8-10 stings. Mean suckers! The 2nd time by large yellow jungle hornets - 6-8 stings that time and they still hurt + sore. I'm not allergic to bees but I'm going to have to stay clear of the jungle for a couple days - I don't want to stung any more until I've had a chance to recover from this bout.
I haven't summed everything yet, but I figure I listed info from about 100 coke bottles. It's really tough to read some due to weak embossing/moss/hazing plus the heat/humidity makes it hard to keep sweat out of my eyes. I still need to hit 3 or 4 more places I know before I will have some good data for you.
I'll put any bottles aside that have letter codes instead of numbers so I can confirm once the bottles have been cleaned - the rest I'm leaving behind as they may have some historical significance.
The vast majority of the ones I listed today are the typical Owens Corning # -<|> # type with clear glass and small "Trade Mark" embossing. Most of these are from 1945, but again I really only sampled from one dump site.
I do believe I found one with "2N <|> 45" that I hopefully put aside.
In my collection at home I have the following:
9D <> 44 (Pat-D, Oakland CA embossed on the base, green glass)
5L <> 44 (Pat-D, No embossing on base, clear glass)
2C <> 44 (Trade Mark, no embossing on base except for a single raised dimple, clear glass)
8P <> 44 (Pat-D, no embossing on base, clear glass)
8R <> 44 (Pat-D, no embossing on base, clear glass)
5K <> 44 (Pat-D, Oakland CA embossed on the base, green glass)
I still need to hit the area where I found most of the Oakland CA bottles - there are probably more letter date codes there.
Give me a week to get as much data as possible, and I will summarize for you and Bill.
FYI all the manufacturer marks are Owens-Corning (vast majority), Chattanooga Glass Company (C in a circle), and a 3rd mark I have not been able to identify. This is on most of the newer bottles - early 50s. It appears to be a circle with a horizontal line across it, and two vertical lines extending from the top and bottom of the circle. It's really tough to see since it's so small and embossing isn't the greatest. I'll keep digging.
-Dave
I haven't summed everything yet, but I figure I listed info from about 100 coke bottles. It's really tough to read some due to weak embossing/moss/hazing plus the heat/humidity makes it hard to keep sweat out of my eyes. I still need to hit 3 or 4 more places I know before I will have some good data for you.
I'll put any bottles aside that have letter codes instead of numbers so I can confirm once the bottles have been cleaned - the rest I'm leaving behind as they may have some historical significance.
The vast majority of the ones I listed today are the typical Owens Corning # -<|> # type with clear glass and small "Trade Mark" embossing. Most of these are from 1945, but again I really only sampled from one dump site.
I do believe I found one with "2N <|> 45" that I hopefully put aside.
In my collection at home I have the following:
9D <> 44 (Pat-D, Oakland CA embossed on the base, green glass)
5L <> 44 (Pat-D, No embossing on base, clear glass)
2C <> 44 (Trade Mark, no embossing on base except for a single raised dimple, clear glass)
8P <> 44 (Pat-D, no embossing on base, clear glass)
8R <> 44 (Pat-D, no embossing on base, clear glass)
5K <> 44 (Pat-D, Oakland CA embossed on the base, green glass)
I still need to hit the area where I found most of the Oakland CA bottles - there are probably more letter date codes there.
Give me a week to get as much data as possible, and I will summarize for you and Bill.
FYI all the manufacturer marks are Owens-Corning (vast majority), Chattanooga Glass Company (C in a circle), and a 3rd mark I have not been able to identify. This is on most of the newer bottles - early 50s. It appears to be a circle with a horizontal line across it, and two vertical lines extending from the top and bottom of the circle. It's really tough to see since it's so small and embossing isn't the greatest. I'll keep digging.
-Dave