glopf43
Well-Known Member
Hey Rockfish, I just found a mason like that in your photo. They are worth a few dollars[]. As far as the others, I don't know. I'd guess the small ribbed one to be shampoo or some other grooming product...
C.J. As a general rule the more identifiable a bottle/jar the more potintial value. So ones with brand name, embossing's, patent numbers, etc. are the best. The more elaborate the better! And dates/age are important; at least wth the "Federal Law..." bottles you alway's know there between 1932-1964. As for me, I keep them all. But ,I doubt the "plain" ones will ever amount to much. Here's a photo of a "COCOA MARSH" jar. Logo embossed and marked on the bottom, we KNOW for sure the origin of the jar. This makes it more collectable than an unmarked one (and I like the grinning lion logo). Plain ones are never going to be worth anything[:'(]. There just glass...
C.J. As a general rule the more identifiable a bottle/jar the more potintial value. So ones with brand name, embossing's, patent numbers, etc. are the best. The more elaborate the better! And dates/age are important; at least wth the "Federal Law..." bottles you alway's know there between 1932-1964. As for me, I keep them all. But ,I doubt the "plain" ones will ever amount to much. Here's a photo of a "COCOA MARSH" jar. Logo embossed and marked on the bottom, we KNOW for sure the origin of the jar. This makes it more collectable than an unmarked one (and I like the grinning lion logo). Plain ones are never going to be worth anything[:'(]. There just glass...