blade
Well-Known Member
Word.
ORIGINAL: bostaurus
That's very sad. I find Olberman, Maddow and Ed Schultz to be very biased, arrogant, and mean spirited but would never hope for pain and suffering to visit them. We all hold differing views on politics, religion, etc. and we all express those views in differing ways. Society is best served when we can disagree without calling down evil on our opponents. You can argue, protest, campaign, and vote to make your voice heard but to resort to name calling and the desire for harm is to loose the argument.
ORIGINAL: Plumbata
but through the process of sifting the kernels of truth from the voluminous chaff dumped on us daily,
No I would not cry about the death of Hitler and any other despot but neither would I be rejoicing; a thankfulness that the misery of a country is over but no rejoicing over the death. Equating a TV personality with Hitler creates a bogus argument. If we were all required to watch one station maybe it would work. We all have the choice to turn on or turn off the TV, radio, or computer. I personally don't put myself in the category having my "weaknesses" manipulated because I watch FOX, read NRO, or listen to some radio program. Sure you should have a variety but in the end all the sources are being filtered through the ideology of the station or journalist. Most people understand that.Would you cry about the death of Hitler, or any individual who has manipulated the weaknesses of their people to spread propaganda and craft a powerful body of artificially-inoculated public sentiment to further the rapacious agendas of the hidden elite?
ORIGINAL: Plumbata
ORIGINAL: bostaurus
That's very sad. I find Olberman, Maddow and Ed Schultz to be very biased, arrogant, and mean spirited but would never hope for pain and suffering to visit them. We all hold differing views on politics, religion, etc. and we all express those views in differing ways. Society is best served when we can disagree without calling down evil on our opponents. You can argue, protest, campaign, and vote to make your voice heard but to resort to name calling and the desire for harm is to loose the argument.
It is not as if I harbor an active hope or desire for harm or death to befall such people. I did not say that I wish someone would go assassinate them; my position is simply that if they met an unfortunate end in an ironic manner, I would have no sympathy, and would probably be quite happy about it. Would you cry about the death of Hitler, or any individual who has manipulated the weaknesses of their people to spread propaganda and craft a powerful body of artificially-inoculated public sentiment to further the rapacious agendas of the hidden elite?
Didn't think so.
I agree about Olbermann being a biased fool as well, but do not know about the latter 2 people. I figure you are correct about them also. Then there are crackpots like Alex Jones who have only the most crude concept of what they are talking about, and find conspiracies in everything. If all such people who are inclined to subvert the truth to further their own base agendas ceased to exist this minute, the world would be a far better place. I would not feel bad for them, nor would I pray for their souls. I may agree with some observations made by all talking heads, but when you amalgamate everything they have said and get a glimpse into their own motivations, their own personality, you see that very few, if any, are fit to lead a small congregation, let alone guide the minds of millions of complacent Americans on matters of deep and expansive importance.
This is why I listen to NPR/BBC daily, and only watch my news/topical coverage on the internet from sources like Russia Today, Aljazeera English, Journeyman Pictures, etcetera. If you obtain the majority of your information from a single partisan domestic news outlet, regardless of their position along the political and moral continuum, you cease being reasonably and objectively informed. Sure, you will believe that you are well-informed, otherwise you wouldn't be watching or listening to such material, but the microscope of reality will detect otherwise. Likewise, I KNOW that I am not well informed, and that I never will be, but through the process of sifting the kernels of truth from the voluminous chaff dumped on us daily, one can approximate an understanding of the mechanics operating beneath the facades of public opinion and behind locked doors. I guess my disdain for mass-media news is drawn from the fact that nowadays they exist solely to craft public opinion, not to disseminate objective fact. I consider this to be both a great evil and a horrible crime against the minds of the American people, and view those manipulators who carry out this injustice as being morally bankrupt, or even downright evil.
ORIGINAL: bostaurus
No I would not cry about the death of Hitler and any other despot but neither would I be rejoicing; a thankfulness that the misery of a country is over but no rejoicing over the death.
ORIGINAL: bostaurus
Equating a TV personality with Hitler creates a bogus argument.
ORIGINAL: bostaurus
We all have the choice to turn on or turn off the TV, radio, or computer. I personally don't put myself in the category having my "weaknesses" manipulated because I watch FOX, read NRO, or listen to some radio program.
ORIGINAL: bostaurus
Sure you should have a variety but in the end all the sources are being filtered through the ideology of the station or journalist. Most people understand that.
ORIGINAL: bostaurus
most folks are not as easily lead into arguments like me